Encoding
0% Encoded

Governed Documentation Automation

PROVEN IN REGULATED INDUSTRIES

Trusted by leading engineering teams

0%
Up to 80% reduction in documentation effort
Customer testimonial for EVA engineering documentation automation
“Achieved up to 80% reduction in lead time and effort for support requests.”
Jason Mudge
Manager, Applications Engineering
Customer testimonial for EVA engineering documentation automation
“Selected for a complete end-to-end solution, an ideal partner for ABB.”
Barbara Panella
Global Division Technology Manager
Customer testimonial for EVA engineering documentation automation
“Reducing downtime and improving operational performance with EVA.”
Deirdre Lacey
Director of Operational Excellence
Sensata Technologies logo
“Achieved up to 80% reduction in lead time and effort for support requests.”
Jason Mudge
Manager, Applications Engineering
ABB logo
“Selected for a complete end-to-end solution, an ideal partner for ABB.”
Barbara Panella
Global Division Technology Manager
Bausch and Lomb logo
“Reducing downtime and improving operational performance with EVA.”
Deirdre Lacey
Director of Operational Excellence
Technical Offers
Engineering To Order
Certification Documents
Test Reports
Quality Documentation
PROBLEM

Up to half of engineering time is spent on documentation. Not engineering

Engineering documentation is still a manual, fragmented process.
It slows teams down and creates risk across delivery, compliance, and cost efficiency.

Engineering documentation requires structured, validated, and traceable documentation.
It is a governed execution problem.

No existing approach reliably automates trusted, audit-ready outputs at scale.
Where engineering time goes
Documentation Engineering
SOLUTION

From engineering knowledge to approved documentation

Not another chat bot. Not another agent.

DIFFERENTIATION

Existing approaches break at scale

They fail where it matters, producing outputs engineers can trust, review, and approve.

Generic AI

Helps draft content but lacks structure, validation, and traceability.

Outputs are inconsistent, difficult to verify, and prone to hallucinations  with no reliable way to prove correctness at delivery.

Custom solutions

Solve parts of the workflow but are expensive to build and narrow in scope.

They require specialised engineering capability that is rarely available, making them impossible to scale across teams.

Manual processes

Rely on knowledge assembly across documents, spreadsheets, and expert memory.

This leads to excessive checking, approval loops, and slow delivery with no systematic way to retain or reuse knowledge.

Generic AI

Generates content but lacks structure, validation, and traceability.

Outputs appear plausible but fail under scrutiny.

Custom solutions

Solve parts of the workflow but don’t scale across teams or use cases.

High effort required with limited long-term leverage.

Manual processes

Rely on documents, spreadsheets, and expert knowledge to produce outputs.

Slow, inconsistent, and difficult to review and audit.

GET STARTED

Less paperwork.
More engineering.

See how EVA helps engineering teams turn documentation into structured, traceable, reusable knowledge while reducing repeated manual work from the start.

__